They include four items: confident care and attention values (“Alarming facilitate us to stop problems afterwards”), philosophy from the uncontrollability and possibilities (“My worrying is unsafe for me”), intellectual skills (“You will find absolutely nothing believe during my recollections for terminology and you may names”), general negative philosophy (“If i don’t handle a thinking consider, after which it happened, it might be my blame”), and you can intellectual worry about-consciousness (“I believe much in the my opinion”). Brand new metacognition questionnaire are scored in an excellent cuatro point measure out-of 1 (“do not agree”) so you’re able to 4 (“consent considerably”) along with an effective Chronbach’s leader = .88. The metacognition questionnaire has been used generally into the low-systematic examples such as for instance cigarette smokers and you may pupils [forty-two, 45]. An entire get is actually determined to create a catalog away from metacognition per participant.

This new Compulsive-Compulsive Catalog was a beneficial 42-item worry about-declaration questionnaire, evaluating the seriousness of some obsessions and compulsions out-of OCD from inside the people . The brand new fanatical-fanatical catalog consists of 7 subscales that include washing (“We tidy my give more often otherwise longer than requisite”), checking (“I go back again to metropolitan areas with the intention that We have perhaps not hurt some one”), doubt (“Whether or not I really do some thing carefully I feel so it is not somewhat best”), purchasing (“I have disappointed if the anyone else has changed how i has set up my things”), obsessing (“I have found challenging to control my personal viewpoint”), hoarding (“I assemble something I do not you would like”), and you may neutralising (“I feel I need to repeat particular amounts”). It inventory was scored towards the a beneficial 4 section Likert size, in one (“not really”) to 4 (“extremely”) together with good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A total rating was calculated to make one to rating for each and every new member linked to O-C attacks.

Procedure

A chance test out-of college students took part in the research. Members had been first served with Cape Coral escort reviews facts about the analysis and you can offered the opportunity to ask questions about this. Immediately after providing concur, per participant provided group advice, after which had been served with the fresh five forms inside a counterbalanced buy to answer from the their own time. If new member complete he/she was thanked and debriefed. All material and procedures followed the fresh new moral guidance and procedures detailed from the American Psychological Relationship and you can was indeed seemed and you will acknowledged by School regarding Hertfordshire stability committee (Number:14149216).

Overall performance

Study are processed to own destroyed philosophy, outliers and you can assumptions regarding mathematical research prior to any data . The details had acceptable thinking to have skewness and kurtosis no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of one’s an incredible number of all of the determined spiders found confident and you can high relationships among them (Dining table 1). The best organization is actually involving the indexes off condition and you will attribute stress, followed closely by the fresh new connection ranging from nervousness susceptibility, metacognition and you can O-C episodes.

Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].

In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.